chad: is underdeveloped country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underdeveloped country 1.00
is underdeveloped 0.97
is poor country 0.82
is developing country 0.81
be poor country 0.81
is impoverished 0.80
is country 0.80
be considered developing country 0.79
be country 0.78
be considered country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(country, is underdeveloped)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(chad, is underdeveloped)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chad, is developing country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chad, is developing country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chad, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chad, be poor country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chad, is impoverished)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chad, is country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chad, is developing country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chad, is impoverished)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chad, is country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is impoverished)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, be poor country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(chad, be poor country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chad, is poor country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chad, be country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, be country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chad, is poor country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chad, be country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chad, is poor country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, is impoverished)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chad, be considered country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chad, be considered country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chad, be considered country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chad, be country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chad, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)