chad: be considered country

Property	Similarity
be considered country	1.00
be country	0.90
is country	0.89
be considered developing country	0.89
is developing country	0.79
be poor country	0.78
is poor country	0.78
is underdeveloped country	0.75

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(chad, be considered developing country)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(chad, is country)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(chad, be country)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(chad, be considered developing country)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(chad, is country)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(chad, is country)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(chad, be country)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(chad, be country)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(chad, is developing country)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(chad, is developing country)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(chad, is developing country)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(chad, is developing country)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(chad, be country)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(chad, be poor country)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(chad, be poor country)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(chad, is country)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(chad, be poor country)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor country)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(chad, is poor country)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(chad, is poor country)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(chad, is poor country)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(chad, be considered country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)

Parents	place Weight: 0.58 , state Weight: 0.54 , country Weight: 0.54 , nation Weight: 0.50 , person Weight: 0.49
Siblings	arkansas Weight: 0.32 , central african republic Weight: 0.32 , milwaukee Weight: 0.32 , delaware Weight: 0.32 , tennessee Weight: 0.32

chad: be considered country

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings