chad: be considered developing country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered developing country 1.00
is developing country 0.96
is developing 0.89
be considered country 0.89
is country 0.80
be country 0.80
is underdeveloped country 0.79
is poor country 0.76
be poor country 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chad, be considered developing country)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chad, is developing country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chad, is developing country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chad, is developing country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chad, is developing country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chad, be considered country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chad, is country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chad, be country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(chad, be considered country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, be poor country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chad, is poor country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chad, be country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(chad, be considered country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(chad, be poor country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chad, is country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chad, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chad, be poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, be country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chad, be country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chad, is country)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chad, is poor country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, be considered developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chad, be considered developing country)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)