champagne: be more expensive than wine

Related concepts

Parents	white wine Weight: 0.74 , alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.64 , carbonated beverage Weight: 0.62 , bottle Weight: 0.58 , drink Weight: 0.57
Siblings	glass bottle Weight: 0.36 , vodka Weight: 0.36 , drinking beer Weight: 0.36 , red wine Weight: 0.36 , wine bottle Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than wine	1.00
be better than wine	0.95
be typically sweeter than red wine	0.89
be more expensive than prosecco	0.89
be more intoxicating than wine	0.87
be more expensive than drinks	0.87
have higher proof than white wine	0.86
get out red wine	0.86
be more expensive than hot drinks	0.85
be more expensive than white	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(white wine, get out red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(white wine, get out red wine)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(white wine, get out red wine)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(white wine, get out red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than wine)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(champagne, be better than wine)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(champagne, be better than wine)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(champagne, be better than wine)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(white wine, get out red wine)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(red wine, be better than wine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(white wine, get out red wine)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)