champagne: be better than wine

Related concepts

Parents	white wine Weight: 0.74 , alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.64 , carbonated beverage Weight: 0.62 , bottle Weight: 0.58 , drink Weight: 0.57
Siblings	glass bottle Weight: 0.36 , vodka Weight: 0.36 , drinking beer Weight: 0.36 , red wine Weight: 0.36 , wine bottle Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than wine	1.00
be more expensive than wine	0.95
be typically sweeter than red wine	0.89
be better than beer	0.89
get out red wine	0.88
have higher proof than white wine	0.87
be more intoxicating than wine	0.86
be better than whiskey	0.86
be healthier than beer	0.84
be more expensive than prosecco	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(champagne, be better than wine)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(white wine, get out red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(champagne, be better than wine)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(white wine, get out red wine)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(white wine, get out red wine)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than beer)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than beer)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(champagne, be better than wine)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(white wine, get out red wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(champagne, be better than wine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than wine)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(vodka, be better than beer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than beer)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than beer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than beer)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(vodka, be better than whiskey) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(vodka, be better than whiskey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(champagne, be better than wine)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than wine)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(champagne, be more intoxicating than wine)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(champagne, be better than wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(white wine, get out red wine)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(vodka, be better than beer)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than beer)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(vodka, be better than whiskey)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(red wine, be better than wine)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(white wine, get out red wine)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Typical(champagne, be better than wine) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(white wine, be typically sweeter than red wine)