change: be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, revision
Weight: 0.61
, intervention
Weight: 0.60
Siblings departure
Weight: 0.67
, transformation
Weight: 0.66
, correction
Weight: 0.64
, evolution
Weight: 0.63
, deletion
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources 1.00
be in ecosystem 0.81
be in species 0.78
be in population 0.76
affect migration 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(evolution, affect migration)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(evolution, affect migration) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(evolution, affect migration)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(change, be in species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(change, be in ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(change, be in ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(change, be in species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(change, be in population)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(change, be in population)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(change, be in species)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(change, be in population)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(change, be in ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(change, be in population)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(change, be in species)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(change, be in ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(evolution, affect migration)