change: be in species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, revision
Weight: 0.61
, intervention
Weight: 0.60
Siblings departure
Weight: 0.67
, transformation
Weight: 0.66
, correction
Weight: 0.64
, evolution
Weight: 0.63
, deletion
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in species 1.00
be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources 0.78
be in humans 0.76
cause extinction 0.76
were in respiratory systems important to vertebrate evolution 0.75
were in respiratory system important to vertebrate evolution 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(change, be in species)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, cause extinction)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(change, cause extinction)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(change, be in populations related to availability of ecosystems resources)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(change, cause extinction)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(change, cause extinction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(change, be in species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(change, be in species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(change, be in species)