change: be to atomic theory necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, revision
Weight: 0.61
, intervention
Weight: 0.60
Siblings departure
Weight: 0.67
, transformation
Weight: 0.66
, correction
Weight: 0.64
, evolution
Weight: 0.63
, deletion
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to atomic theory necessary 1.00
be in scientific method important 0.75
is most contentious scientific theory 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(change, be to atomic theory necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(evolution, is most contentious scientific theory)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(change, be to atomic theory necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(evolution, is most contentious scientific theory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(evolution, is most contentious scientific theory)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(change, be to atomic theory necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(change, be to atomic theory necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(evolution, is most contentious scientific theory)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(change, be to atomic theory necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)