step: be in scientific method important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings move
Weight: 0.67
, appointment
Weight: 0.67
, challenge
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, planning
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in scientific method important 1.00
be in scientific method 0.99
be in scientific methods 0.94
be in method important 0.91
be in method 0.88
be important in scientific study 0.88
be important to scientific study 0.87
be scientific name 0.84
be scientific name written 0.80
be necessary for qualitative researchers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(part, be scientific name written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(part, be scientific name written)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(part, be scientific name written)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in scientific study)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to scientific study)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(part, be scientific name written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(planning, be important in scientific study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in scientific study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(planning, be important to scientific study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to scientific study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific method important)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific method)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific method)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in scientific methods)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific methods)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(step, be in method important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(step, be in method important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be in scientific methods)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(step, be in method)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(step, be in method)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(step, be in method important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(step, be in method)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific methods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(step, be in method)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, be in scientific method important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(part, be scientific name written)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(planning, be important to scientific study)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(planning, be important in scientific study)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(part, be scientific name written)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(step, be in scientific method important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)