chart: be better than data presented for presentation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graph
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, course
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
Siblings average
Weight: 0.33
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.31
, volume
Weight: 0.31
, tutorial
Weight: 0.31
, study
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than data presented for presentation 1.00
be better than data presented for presentation of information 0.98
be better than data presented 0.95
be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation 0.95
be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation of information 0.94
be useful in presentation of data 0.92
be important in presentation 0.89
be useful in presentation 0.89
be better than data presented in worksheet 0.88
be important in visual presentation 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation of information)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation of information)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(chart, be useful in presentation of data)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chart, be useful in presentation of data)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation of information)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation of information)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chart, be useful in presentation of data)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(chart, be useful in presentation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chart, be useful in presentation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chart, be important in presentation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chart, be important in presentation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation of information)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(chart, be useful in presentation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation of information)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chart, be important in visual presentation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chart, be important in presentation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chart, be important in visual presentation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation of information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chart, be important in visual presentation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet for presentation of information)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chart, be useful in presentation of data)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented in worksheet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(chart, be important in presentation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chart, be useful in presentation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chart, be important in visual presentation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(chart, be better than data presented for presentation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)