graph: be important in visual presentation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chart
Weight: 0.66
, asymptote
Weight: 0.34
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33
, map
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in visual presentation 1.00
be useful presenting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chart, be important in visual presentation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chart, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chart, be important in visual presentation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chart, be important in visual presentation)