chat: tend ban

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
tend ban 1.00
bans work 0.87
bans levied 0.81
restrict actually work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chat, tend ban)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chat, bans work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chat, bans work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chat, bans work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(chat, bans levied)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chat, bans levied)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(chat, restrict actually work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chat, bans levied)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(chat, bans levied)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(chat, bans work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chat, restrict actually work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chat, restrict actually work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(chat, restrict actually work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chat, tend ban)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(chat, tend ban)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chat, tend ban)