cheating: be in relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings infidelity
Weight: 0.34
, adultery
Weight: 0.33
, bullying
Weight: 0.33
, cheater
Weight: 0.33
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in relationships 1.00
be in relationship 0.91
be for relationship 0.90
has state relationship 0.86
change relationship 0.86
tear apart relationship 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cheater, be in relationships)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cheater, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cheater, be in relationships)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cheating, be in relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cheating, change relationship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cheating, be in relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be for relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cheating, change relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(cheating, change relationship)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cheating, has state relationship)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cheating, be in relationship)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(cheating, be for relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cheating, has state relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cheating, be in relationship)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cheating, change relationship)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cheating, has state relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cheating, be for relationship)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cheating, has state relationship)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cheating, be for relationship)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cheating, tear apart relationship)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cheating, tear apart relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cheating, be in relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cheating, be in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cheater, be in relationships)