cheers: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, television show
Weight: 0.54
, television series
Weight: 0.53
, tv show
Weight: 0.52
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.34
, cheer
Weight: 0.33
, shout
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, love song
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is low quality 0.84
be in great shape now 0.80
be in great shape 0.79
is bad now 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cheers, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cheers, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cheers, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hit, is low quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hit, is low quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(love song, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cheers, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cheers, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cheers, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(love song, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(love song, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cheers, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cheers, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(love song, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(cheers, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)