show: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talk show
Weight: 0.81
, tv show
Weight: 0.76
, game show
Weight: 0.75
, television show
Weight: 0.74
Siblings soap opera
Weight: 0.70
, fresh air
Weight: 0.67
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.67
, full house
Weight: 0.65
, radio
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
is bad quality 0.89
has quality bad 0.87
has quality benefits 0.79
has quality news 0.78
is am bad quality 0.76
is am quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(radio, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(radio, has quality news)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big bang theory, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fresh air, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fresh air, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(radio, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(radio, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(radio, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(radio, has quality news)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio, is am bad quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(show, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(big bang theory, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh air, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(radio, has quality news)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(show, is quality)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)