radio: is am bad quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is am bad quality 1.00
is am quality 0.97
is am bad 0.97
is am terrible 0.92
is am used 0.90
am is better at night 0.90
is am talk 0.88
am sound like am radio 0.88
am keep working 0.86
is am relevant 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio, is am bad quality)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am used)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am talk)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(radio, is am used)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(radio, is am used)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radio, is am talk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(radio, is am talk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(radio, is am relevant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(radio, am is better at night)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(radio, am is better at night)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(radio, is am relevant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(radio, is am relevant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(radio, am is better at night)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am relevant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am used)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am talk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(radio, is am bad quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality)