radio: is am used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents radio station
Weight: 0.72
, broadcast
Weight: 0.69
, television
Weight: 0.68
, show
Weight: 0.65
, network
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television station
Weight: 0.42
, television show
Weight: 0.36
, television series
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is am used 1.00
is am bad 0.94
is am quality 0.93
is am talk 0.92
am sound like am radio 0.91
is am bad quality 0.90
am is better at night 0.90
is am terrible 0.89
am keep working 0.89
am keep working after noon 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(radio, is am used)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am bad quality)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(radio, am is better at night)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am talk)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am talk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(radio, is am talk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(radio, is am talk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(radio, am is better at night)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio, is am bad quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(radio, am is better at night)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio, is am bad quality)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(radio, am is better at night)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(radio, is am bad quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(radio, is am used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(radio, is am used)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(radio, is am used)