chef: have in clothing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in clothing 1.00
have in white clothing 0.95
have clothes 0.91
wear clothes 0.88
have white clothes 0.87
wear white clothes 0.86
wear uniforms in restaurants 0.80
wear uniforms 0.79
wear shirts 0.78
traditionally wear coats 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chef, have in clothing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(painter, have white clothes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear clothes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(painter, have clothes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(chef, have in clothing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(painter, have clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(painter, have clothes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(painter, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(painter, wear clothes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(painter, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(painter, wear uniforms)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(painter, have white clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(painter, have white clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chef, have in clothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chef, have in clothing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(painter, have clothes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(painter, wear clothes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(painter, wear uniforms)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(painter, have white clothes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(chef, have in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)