cook: wear uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chef
Weight: 0.57
, cooking meal
Weight: 0.35
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear uniforms 1.00
wear hats 0.87
wear pants 0.84
wear white 0.84
wear masks 0.84
wear aprons 0.83
wear black gloves 0.83
wear blue trousers 0.83
wear gloves 0.83
wear aprons kfc 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, wear black gloves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cook, wear uniforms)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cook, wear masks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cook, wear masks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear masks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cook, wear masks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cook, wear aprons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear aprons kfc)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cook, wear aprons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cook, wear aprons kfc)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear black gloves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(cook, wear aprons kfc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear aprons kfc)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(cook, wear aprons)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear aprons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cook, wear black gloves)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cook, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cook, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear uniforms)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear black gloves)