chef: wear gloves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear gloves 1.00
wear black gloves 0.97
wear hats 0.87
wear hat 0.86
wear long hats 0.85
wear clothes 0.85
wear pants 0.85
wear white clothes 0.85
wear jacket with sleeves 0.84
wear shirts 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(artist, wear hat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear black gloves)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(artist, wear hat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pianist, wear gloves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear clothes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(artist, wear hat)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chef, wear gloves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(pianist, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pianist, wear gloves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(painter, wear clothes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(painter, wear clothes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(painter, wear pants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(chef, wear gloves)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear black gloves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chef, wear hat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chef, wear black gloves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, wear black gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(chef, wear hat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chef, wear long hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, wear hats)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chef, wear pants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(chef, wear long hats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chef, wear long hats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear long hats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(painter, wear clothes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pianist, wear gloves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painter, wear pants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(chef, wear gloves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(artist, wear hat)