chef: wear pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear pants 1.00
wear trousers 0.93
wear checked pants 0.91
wear check trousers 0.90
wear blue check trousers 0.90
wear checkered pants 0.89
wear clothes 0.88
wear checked trousers 0.88
wear jacket with sleeves 0.88
wear white clothes 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear trousers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear clothes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(painter, wear pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(painter, wear clothes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(painter, wear clothes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chef, wear pants)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chef, wear trousers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, wear trousers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chef, wear trousers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear trousers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(painter, wear clothes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painter, wear pants)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(chef, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants)