cook: wear checkered pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chef
Weight: 0.57
, cooking meal
Weight: 0.35
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear checkered pants 1.00
wear checkered trousers 0.96
wear blue checkered trousers 0.96
wear pants 0.89
wear blue trousers 0.85
wear trousers 0.84
wear black gloves 0.81
wear white 0.80
wear hats 0.79
wear gloves 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear trousers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear gloves)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chef, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chef, wear trousers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chef, wear trousers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(chef, wear black gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chef, wear black gloves)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(chef, wear gloves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chef, wear gloves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cook, wear checkered pants)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered trousers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cook, wear blue checkered trousers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cook, wear checkered trousers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cook, wear checkered trousers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cook, wear blue checkered trousers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cook, wear blue checkered trousers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cook, wear trousers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cook, wear trousers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cook, wear black gloves)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cook, wear black gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cook, wear black gloves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered trousers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cook, wear white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear blue checkered trousers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear trousers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear blue trousers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear black gloves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chef, wear trousers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chef, wear gloves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear black gloves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)