chef: wear checkered pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear checkered pants 1.00
wear pants 0.89
wear trousers 0.84
wear blue check trousers 0.84
wear jacket with long sleeves 0.84
wear checked pants 0.84
wear jacket with sleeves 0.83
wear check trousers 0.83
wear white clothes 0.82
wear checked trousers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cook, wear trousers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear checkered pants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear trousers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear pants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(cook, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cook, wear trousers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(painter, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(painter, wear pants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(painter, wear white clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(painter, wear white clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chef, wear checkered pants)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(chef, wear pants)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chef, wear pants)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, wear pants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chef, wear trousers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(chef, wear trousers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chef, wear trousers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear trousers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear checkered pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(painter, wear pants)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(painter, wear white clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cook, wear checkered pants)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(chef, wear checkered pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cook, wear trousers)