chemicals: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.56
, company
Weight: 0.56
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.48
, business
Weight: 0.48
, sector
Weight: 0.41
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.33
, oil company
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, software company
Weight: 0.32
, packaging
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be harmful for environment 0.89
help environment 0.87
has quality bad 0.80
be in food bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(oil company, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(packaging, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(packaging, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chemicals, help environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chemicals, help environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(chemicals, be in food bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(chemicals, help environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chemicals, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(chemicals, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chemicals, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, help environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(oil company, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(packaging, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)