chemicals: be harmful for environment

Property	Similarity
be harmful for environment	1.00
be harmful	0.92
be bad for environment	0.89
help environment	0.85
be beneficial	0.77
be toxic to human	0.77
is toxic	0.76

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be bad for environment)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, help environment)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(chemicals, be bad for environment)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(chemicals, help environment)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be beneficial)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(chemicals, is toxic)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(chemicals, be bad for environment)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(chemicals, help environment)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(chemicals, help environment)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(chemicals, be harmful)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(chemicals, be toxic to human)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(chemicals, be bad for environment)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(chemicals, be beneficial)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(chemicals, is toxic)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(chemicals, be beneficial)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(chemicals, be beneficial)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(chemicals, is toxic)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.23

Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(chemicals, is toxic)

Parents	industry Weight: 0.56 , company Weight: 0.56 , manufacturer Weight: 0.48 , business Weight: 0.48 , sector Weight: 0.41
Siblings	chemical plant Weight: 0.33 , oil company Weight: 0.32 , automobile industry Weight: 0.32 , software company Weight: 0.32 , packaging Weight: 0.32

chemicals: be harmful for environment

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings