chemotherapy: fail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.64
, regimen
Weight: 0.62
, modality
Weight: 0.61
, agent
Weight: 0.60
, prostate cancer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gene therapy
Weight: 0.66
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.36
, dialysis
Weight: 0.36
, transplant
Weight: 0.34
, mastectomy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail 1.00
fail because of rejection 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(transplant, fail)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(transplant, fail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dialysis, fail)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dialysis, fail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(chemotherapy, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(transplant, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(dialysis, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, fail)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)