chennai: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, city
Weight: 0.54
, india
Weight: 0.53
, country
Weight: 0.45
, world
Weight: 0.44
Siblings hyderabad
Weight: 0.34
, mumbai
Weight: 0.34
, taj mahal
Weight: 0.33
, kolkata
Weight: 0.33
, mexico city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hyderabad, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hyderabad, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hyderabad, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(chennai, is boring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chennai, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(chennai, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(chennai, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hyderabad, is boring)