cherry: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.72
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.65
, apple
Weight: 0.65
, hardwood
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple tree
Weight: 0.39
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be toxic to dogs 0.84
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(cherry, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cherry, be toxic to dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be toxic to dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cherry, be toxic to dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cherry, be toxic to dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cherry, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(cherry, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cherry, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cherry, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)