chess set: be used to redundance

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.61
, board game
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, gift
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chess
Weight: 0.37
, chess board
Weight: 0.36
, chess piece
Weight: 0.36
, tennis game
Weight: 0.35
, hockey game
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to redundance 1.00
be used to socialise 1.00
be used to playinh 1.00
be at use 0.84
be used to use your money 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gift, be used to use your money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chess set, be used to redundance)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(game, be used to playinh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chess set, be used to redundance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(game, be used to playinh)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(gift, be used to use your money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(game, be used to playinh)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(gift, be used to use your money)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tennis game, be used to socialise)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chess board, be at use)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(game, be used to playinh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(gift, be used to use your money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tennis game, be used to socialise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tennis game, be used to socialise)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chess board, be at use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chess board, be at use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chess set, be used to redundance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(chess set, be used to redundance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(game, be used to playinh)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gift, be used to use your money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tennis game, be used to socialise)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chess board, be at use)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(game, be used to playinh)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(chess set, be used to redundance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(gift, be used to use your money)