chewing gum: be wrapped in foil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.60
, eating apple
Weight: 0.33
, banana peel
Weight: 0.32
, eating
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wrapped in foil 1.00
be wrapped in strips 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil)