gum: be wrapped in foil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, chewing gum
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings acacia
Weight: 0.65
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35
, rock candy
Weight: 0.35
, lollipop
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wrapped in foil 1.00
be wrapped in strips 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in foil)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(gum, be wrapped in foil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chewing gum, be wrapped in strips)