chicken: eat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat 1.00
eat more 0.94
eat food 0.93
eat poop 0.87
eat poop in morning 0.84
be eaten 0.84
vomit eating 0.83
eat rocks 0.82
eat grass 0.82
eat corn in morning 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, eat grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pet, eat grass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pet, eat grass)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, eat grass) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(chicken, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(chicken, eat)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chicken, vomit eating)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chicken, eat food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat rocks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chicken, vomit eating)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pet, eat grass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chicken, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pet, eat grass)