chicken: eat grass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.66
, entree
Weight: 0.66
, frozen food
Weight: 0.65
Siblings broiler
Weight: 0.53
, dark meat
Weight: 0.42
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, fried egg
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat grass 1.00
eat 0.82
eat food 0.80
eat chicken droppings 0.80
eat corn in morning 0.79
eat poop 0.79
eat more 0.78
eat grasshoppers 0.78
eat rocks 0.78
eat poop in morning 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, eat grass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pet, eat grass)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pet, eat grass)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pet, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chicken, eat grass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chicken, eat grass)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chicken, eat rocks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat rocks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chicken, eat rocks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(chicken, eat food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chicken, eat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat grass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(chicken, eat grass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pet, eat grass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(chicken, eat grass)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(pet, eat grass)