chickpea: be good for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.64
, ingredient
Weight: 0.58
, seed
Weight: 0.56
, legume
Weight: 0.53
, vegetable
Weight: 0.52
Siblings lentil
Weight: 0.37
, sesame seed
Weight: 0.35
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.35
, sunflower
Weight: 0.35
, tomato
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.97
be good for us 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be bad for dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be good for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be good for us)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lentil, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lentil, be good for dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(lentil, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lentil, be bad for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lentil, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lentil, be good for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chickpea, be good for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(chickpea, be bad for dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be bad for dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chickpea, be bad for dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chickpea, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(chickpea, be good for us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chickpea, be good for us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chickpea, be good for us)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chickpea, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lentil, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lentil, be good for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lentil, be good for us)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chickpea, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)