tomato: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cherry tomato
Weight: 0.78
, petunia
Weight: 0.42
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.40
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.40
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
have in them 0.84
has quality good 0.80
be bad for dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tomato, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tomato, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tomato, have in them)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tomato, have in them)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tomato, have in them)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(tomato, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tomato, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tomato, have in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tomato, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(tomato, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)