chihuahua: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.69
, breed
Weight: 0.65
, small dog
Weight: 0.64
, cat
Weight: 0.62
, toy
Weight: 0.55
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, pug
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.82
have bad teeth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small dog, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pug, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, have bad teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pug, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(cat, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(small dog, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pug, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pug, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pug, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pug, has physical part eyes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dachshund, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dachshund, have bad teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, have bad teeth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chihuahua, has physical part eyes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(chihuahua, have bad teeth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, have bad teeth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(chihuahua, have bad teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pug, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pug, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dachshund, have bad teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(small dog, have bad teeth)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part whiskers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has physical part eyes)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(chihuahua, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)