child: play

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents boy
Weight: 0.66
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, angel
Weight: 0.65
, toddler
Weight: 0.61
Siblings boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, daughter
Weight: 0.65
, nurse
Weight: 0.65
, baby
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
play 1.00
play habbo 1.00
has play 0.95
want play 0.90
play call 0.88
playing games 0.87
play football 0.86
play video games 0.85
stop playing 0.84
play computer games 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(child, play)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(baby, play)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(baby, play)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(baby, play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(child, play)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(child, play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(child, has play)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(child, play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(child, want play)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(child, has play)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(child, play)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(child, play football)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(child, play)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(child, play football)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(child, play football)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(child, want play)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(child, play)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(child, play football)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(child, play)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(child, has play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(child, play)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(child, want play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(child, play)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(child, has play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(child, play)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(child, want play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(child, play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(child, play)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(child, play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(child, play)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(child, play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(child, play)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(baby, play)