child: play football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents boy
Weight: 0.66
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, angel
Weight: 0.65
, toddler
Weight: 0.61
Siblings boy scout
Weight: 0.67
, daughter
Weight: 0.65
, nurse
Weight: 0.65
, baby
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
play football 1.00
play 0.86
play habbo 0.86
has play 0.83
playing games 0.82
want play 0.81
play computer games 0.80
play video games 0.80
playing video games 0.79
stop playing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(baby, play)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(baby, play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(baby, play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(child, play football)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(child, play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(child, has play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(child, want play)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(child, play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(child, want play)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(child, has play)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(child, play)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(child, want play)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(child, play)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(child, has play)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(child, want play)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(child, has play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(child, play football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(child, play football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(child, play football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(baby, play)