chile: be prone to earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.61
, economy
Weight: 0.60
, democracy
Weight: 0.60
, market
Weight: 0.59
, state
Weight: 0.58
Siblings jamaica
Weight: 0.32
, argentina
Weight: 0.32
, uruguay
Weight: 0.32
, mexico
Weight: 0.32
, california
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to earthquakes 1.00
have earthquakes 0.93
get earthquakes 0.92
have many earthquakes 0.91
get many earthquakes 0.91
have history of earthquakes 0.91
have earthquakes everyday 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(california, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(california, have many earthquakes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(mexico, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(california, have earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(california, have earthquakes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(california, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(california, be prone to earthquakes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(california, have many earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(california, have many earthquakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chile, have earthquakes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(chile, have earthquakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chile, have earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chile, have many earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(chile, have many earthquakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chile, have many earthquakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chile, have earthquakes everyday)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chile, get many earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chile, get many earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(chile, get many earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(chile, have earthquakes everyday)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chile, have earthquakes everyday)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(chile, have earthquakes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chile, have history of earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(chile, have history of earthquakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(chile, have history of earthquakes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chile, have many earthquakes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chile, get many earthquakes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chile, have earthquakes everyday)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chile, have history of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chile, be prone to earthquakes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(california, be prone to earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(california, have earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(california, have many earthquakes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(chile, be prone to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(mexico, be prone to earthquakes)