chili: be good for cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.70
, spice
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, steak
Weight: 0.37
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for cold 1.00
be hotter after freezing 0.78
is hot 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, is hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chili, be good for cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(spice, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(spice, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, is hot)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chili, be good for cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chili, be good for cold)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, is hot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chili, is hot)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chili, is hot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chili, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chili, be good for cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spice, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(chili, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spice, is hot)