chili: be hotter after freezing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.70
, spice
Weight: 0.68
, flavor
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, potato salad
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, steak
Weight: 0.37
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hotter after freezing 1.00
get hotter in fridge 0.84
is hot 0.79
be good for cold 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, is hot)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(spice, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(spice, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, is hot)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(chili, get hotter in fridge)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chili, get hotter in fridge)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chili, get hotter in fridge)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chili, get hotter in fridge)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chili, be good for cold)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, is hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chili, be good for cold)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chili, is hot)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chili, be good for cold)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(chili, be good for cold)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(chili, is hot)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(chili, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spice, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(chili, be hotter after freezing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spice, is hot)