chinchilla: be banned in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in australia 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.91
be illegal in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be banned in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in california)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be banned in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chinchilla, be banned in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be banned in australia)