chinchilla: be illegal in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.63
, rodent
Weight: 0.56
, species
Weight: 0.53
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.52
, pet
Weight: 0.52
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36
, alpaca
Weight: 0.35
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in california 1.00
be illegal in australia 0.83
be banned in australia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in california)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be banned in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be banned in australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be banned in australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be banned in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, be illegal in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(chinchilla, be illegal in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chinchilla, be illegal in california)