:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Property |
Similarity |
mate |
1.00 |
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(llama, mate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(alpaca, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(alpaca, mate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(llama, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(llama, mate)
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(chinchilla, mate)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chinchilla, mate)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alpaca, mate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(llama, mate)