chinese restaurant: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	restaurant Weight: 0.77 , cafe Weight: 0.68 , store Weight: 0.64 , business Weight: 0.63
Siblings	chinese food Weight: 0.58 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.42 , mexican restaurant Weight: 0.41 , japanese restaurant Weight: 0.41 , indian restaurant Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)