chinese food: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.75
, food
Weight: 0.70
, meal
Weight: 0.61
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dim sum
Weight: 0.60
, noodle
Weight: 0.54
, pet food
Weight: 0.40
, mexican food
Weight: 0.39
, junk food
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is quality 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(chinese restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(fast food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(noodle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(noodle, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mexican food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chinese food, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinese food, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(chinese food, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(noodle, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mexican food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)