junk food: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad food
Weight: 0.81
, food
Weight: 0.74
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, stuff
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.83
, soda pop
Weight: 0.73
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.70
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad food, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bad food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(bad food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(fast food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(junk food, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(junk food, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bad food, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bad food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)