fast food: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
is low quality 0.84
be good for health 0.80
be good for us 0.80
be bad for health 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(junk food, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pizza, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(junk food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(junk food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(pizza, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pizza, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(chinese food, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chinese food, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fast food, is quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(fast food, is low quality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fast food, is quality)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fast food, is quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is low quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fast food, is low quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, is low quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(fast food, is best)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fast food, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(chinese food, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(junk food, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)