fast food: be bad for health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for health 1.00
be good for health 0.97
be considered for health 0.89
has quality bad 0.81
be bad for children 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for economy 0.79
be bad for human body 0.79
be bad for body 0.78
be bad during pregnancy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad during pregnancy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad during pregnancy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad during pregnancy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad during pregnancy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fast food, be considered for health)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fast food, be considered for health)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be considered for health)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be considered for health)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(fast food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)