fast food: be bad for body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for body 1.00
be bad for human body 0.93
hurt body 0.85
make body fat 0.84
be bad for health 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
be bad for children 0.77
be bad for humans 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
be bad for economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hot dog, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(meat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(meat, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(chinese food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chinese food, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, hurt body)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, hurt body)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fast food, hurt body)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fast food, hurt body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, make body fat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, make body fat)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fast food, make body fat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fast food, make body fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(hot dog, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(meat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(chinese food, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fast food, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)